#19061: Auto-generated thematic index of functions
-------------------------+-------------------------------------------------
       Reporter:         |        Owner:
  ncohen                 |       Status:  needs_review
           Type:         |    Milestone:  sage-6.9
  enhancement            |   Resolution:
       Priority:  major  |    Merged in:
      Component:         |    Reviewers:
  documentation          |  Work issues:
       Keywords:         |       Commit:
        Authors:         |  53b8469b104942a4030d68a08df662471bdb8f6f
  Nathann Cohen          |     Stopgaps:
Report Upstream:  N/A    |
         Branch:         |
  public/19061           |
   Dependencies:         |
-------------------------+-------------------------------------------------

Comment (by jmantysalo):

 Replying to [comment:6 ncohen]:

 > > So this is just a suggestion: If we still have for example
 `is_chain_of_poset()` in the index, and not `is_chain_of_poset(elms)`,
 should it be possible to add different onliner to index than what is at
 the beginning of function? Like "Return True if given iterable is a chain
 of the poset." instead of "Return True if `elms` is a chain of the poset".
 >
 > I can imagine that such a feature could be useful eventually. One way to
 make it available would be  through the `@doc_index` constructor, which
 would then take both a index name and a description as an argument.

 Yes, that sounds good. Without this second argument it could work just
 like now.

 I compiled this and got strange results. `graph.html` starts with
 "Algorithmically hard stuff", i.e. uses alphabetical list. Should be
 possible to change it.

 Then, it starts right with "<link>chromatic_number()</link>   Returns the
 minimal number of colors needed to color the vertices", i.e. forgetting
 the ending "of the graph G.". And next one is
 "<link>chromatic_polynomial()</link> chromatic_polynomial(G,
 return_tree_basis=False)".

 Do others get similar results? Can be just some Spinx error and maybe I
 must recompile or something.

--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/19061#comment:7>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to