#19055: Tableau hash depends on subclass
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
       Reporter:  darij              |        Owner:
           Type:  defect             |       Status:  needs_review
       Priority:  major              |    Milestone:  sage-6.9
      Component:  combinatorics      |   Resolution:
       Keywords:  tableaux, hashing  |    Merged in:
        Authors:  Darij Grinberg     |    Reviewers:
Report Upstream:  N/A                |  Work issues:
         Branch:                     |       Commit:
  public/combinat/tableau_hash       |  27788705a3241374377904895b341c9c504605df
   Dependencies:                     |     Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------

Comment (by darij):

 I like your idea, Nicolas; but I'd like to have this structure reflected
 in code somewhere. Something along the lines of: Every array-like class
 `C` has a pointer to the largest array-like class `D` such that `C` is
 transparent over `D` (meaning `x == D(x)` for every instance `x` of `C`).
 For tableaux of various sorts, this would be `Tableau`; for Gelfand-
 Tsetlin patterns it would probably be `GelfandTsetlinPattern` or something
 like this, unless `GelfandTsetlinPattern` itself is a subclass of
 `Tableau`, in which case we would have to introduce a proper subclass for
 actual tableaux to get the Gelfand-Tsetlin patterns out. (Sorry, I don't
 have Sage open right now, and I don't remember the hierarchy.)

--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/19055#comment:8>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to