#18972: twographs and Seidel switching
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: dimpase | Owner:
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_work
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-6.9
Component: graph theory | Resolution:
Keywords: | Merged in:
Authors: | Reviewers: Nathann Cohen
Report Upstream: N/A | Work issues:
Branch: | Commit:
u/dimpase/seidelsw | a3362414d8710523b1a7f118a96fb4617be36637
Dependencies: #18960, #18948, | Stopgaps:
#18988, #18991, #18986, #19018, |
#19019 |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by dimpase):
Replying to [comment:100 ncohen]:
> > I don't call `is_t_design()` this way!
>
> Line 2 of `is_twograph`.
>
I am talking about line 1 of `is_regular_twograph()`...
Besides, what's wrong about the line 2 of is_twograph`?
It's certainly not where the bottleneck is (the latter is in lines 3-4).
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/18972#comment:101>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
