#18292: Fix HTML output
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
       Reporter:  vbraun             |        Owner:
           Type:  defect             |       Status:  needs_info
       Priority:  major              |    Milestone:  sage-6.7
      Component:  notebook           |   Resolution:
       Keywords:                     |    Merged in:
        Authors:  Volker Braun       |    Reviewers:  Andrey Novoseltsev
Report Upstream:  N/A                |  Work issues:
         Branch:                     |       Commit:
  u/vbraun/fix_html_output           |  9a4bc8d4f2cfe6f16567de1c82efb45c9d194023
   Dependencies:                     |     Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------

Comment (by novoselt):

 I guess it sacrifices `html(...)` on the last line and that's why you had
 to adjust doctests, but it is livable and I think is a great option. Karl-
 Dieter - are you happy with this one?

 Regarding interacts, which are also supported by SMCs (!SageMathCell and
 !SageMathCloud ;-)) - what is "the right way" to adjust
 `sage.interacts.decorator.interact` to other UIs?

 Do we need `math_parse`? It seems to me that the string `$x._latex_()$`
 should be a perfectly valid HTML for our UI, i.e. !MathJax will process
 math. The advantage of not fiddling with LaTeX code beyond adding dollar
 signs, apart from simpler code, is that such a string can be used directly
 in LaTeX via SageTeX.

 Typo: `def eval(self, s, locals=None):` has description for `globals`
 argument.

 Why do we need this test:
 {{{
 +        OutputHtml = display_manager.types.OutputHtml
 +        if OutputHtml in display_manager.supported_output():
 +            return OutputHtml(self._html_())
 }}}
 isn't the point of all this display framework to make these decisions
 WITHOUT object's interference?

 Is it really necessary to include `<html>` tag for SageNB?

--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/18292#comment:68>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to