#6869: [with patch, needs work] LP and MIP Solvers in Sage ( with symbolics )
-------------------------+--------------------------------------------------
 Reporter:  ncohen       |       Owner:  jkantor   
     Type:  enhancement  |      Status:  new       
 Priority:  major        |   Milestone:  sage-4.1.2
Component:  numerical    |    Keywords:            
 Reviewer:               |      Author:            
   Merged:               |  
-------------------------+--------------------------------------------------

Comment(by mvngu):

 The module `sage/numerical/mip.pyx` should have 100% doctest coverage,
 given that it's being added to the Sage library:
 {{{
 [mv...@sage numerical]$ sage -coverage mip.pyx
 ----------------------------------------------------------------------
 mip.pyx
 ERROR: Please define a s == loads(dumps(s)) doctest.
 SCORE mip.pyx: 62% (18 of 29)

 Missing documentation:
          * __init__(self, value):
          * __str__(self):
          * __getitem__(self,i):
          * keys(self):
          * items(self):
          * depth(self):
          * values(self):


 Missing doctests:
          * __init__(self,sense=1):
          * _NormalForm(self,exp):
          * _addElementToRing(self):
          * __init__(self,x,f,dim=1):

 ----------------------------------------------------------------------
 }}}

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/6869#comment:3>
Sage <http://sagemath.org/>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to