#18411: get rid of CartesianProduct
-------------------------+-------------------------------------------------
       Reporter:         |        Owner:
  vdelecroix             |       Status:  needs_work
           Type:         |    Milestone:  sage-6.7
  enhancement            |   Resolution:
       Priority:  major  |    Merged in:
      Component:         |    Reviewers:
  combinatorics          |  Work issues:
       Keywords:         |       Commit:
        Authors:         |  9f29074cb9a30ee194affe77ed5b7a28f9318df1
  Vincent Delecroix      |     Stopgaps:
Report Upstream:  N/A    |
         Branch:         |
  public/18411           |
   Dependencies:         |
-------------------------+-------------------------------------------------

Comment (by vdelecroix):

 I got into troubles. Combinatorial free modules are too laxist and you
 discover mistakes only very lately... in the following an element `g` is
 built
 {{{
 sage: M = SchurTensorModule(QQ, 2, 2)
 sage: A = M._schur
 sage: f = M.basis()[(1,1)]
 sage: e = A.basis().values()[0]
 sage: g = e*f
 }}}
 but it is not valid in the sense that the keys do not correspond to the
 basis
 {{{
 sage: map(type, g.monomial_coefficients().keys())
 [<type 'tuple'>]
 sage: g.parent().basis().keys()
 The cartesian product of ({1, 2}, {1, 2})
 }}}
 And hence you '''silently''' got
 {{{
 sage: g.to_vector()
 (0, 0, 0, 0)
 }}}

--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/18411#comment:24>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to