#18305: Element comparison for Python classes
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
       Reporter:  vdelecroix         |        Owner:
           Type:  enhancement        |       Status:  needs_work
       Priority:  major              |    Milestone:  sage-6.9
      Component:  coercion           |   Resolution:
       Keywords:                     |    Merged in:
        Authors:  Vincent Delecroix  |    Reviewers:
Report Upstream:  N/A                |  Work issues:
         Branch:                     |       Commit:
  u/vdelecroix/18305                 |  3f6ea84eb645f1e29426bedc7763c9f31997867b
   Dependencies:                     |     Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------

Comment (by jdemeyer):

 `Py_EQ` should be `op_EQ` here:
 {{{
     INPUT:

     - ``op`` -- a rich comparison operation (e.g. ``Py_EQ``)
 }}}

 `c` can be any integer, not only -1, 0 or 1:
 {{{
     - ``c`` -- the result of an ordinary comparison: -1, 0 or 1.
 }}}

 No trailing slash needed:
 {{{
         sage: from sage.structure.sage_object import (py_rich_to_bool, \
         ....:    op_EQ, op_NE, op_LT, op_LE, op_GT, op_GE)
 }}}

--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/18305#comment:32>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to