#19224: swtich OA(k,n)+* strongly regular graphs
-------------------------+-------------------------------------------------
Reporter: | Owner:
ncohen | Status: needs_work
Type: | Milestone: sage-6.9
enhancement | Resolution:
Priority: major | Merged in:
Component: graph | Reviewers:
theory | Work issues:
Keywords: | Commit:
Authors: | 5a0384c60fb35730a87d96db3a983d0cf27610d6
Nathann Cohen | Stopgaps:
Report Upstream: N/A |
Branch: |
u/ncohen/19224 |
Dependencies: |
-------------------------+-------------------------------------------------
Comment (by dimpase):
Replying to [comment:11 ncohen]:
> I do in the doctest that builds the SRG by calling
`graphs.strongly_regular_graph` (remember that it checks its output).
Before, I had the usual "build the graph + test" doctest, but Vincent
wanted me to query the general constructor instead.
>
> So well, this doctest actually builds the graph and tests it. Like the
one that was there before it.
it does not strike me as a reliable way to test; if the implementation of
`graphs.strongly_regular_graph` changes, you'd be SOL. And testing only
one tuple of parameters looks a bit too weak, too...
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/19224#comment:12>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
