#12871: Conversion for RR[x][y] stricter than for QQ[x][y]
---------------------------+----------------------------------------------
       Reporter:  vbraun   |        Owner:  AlexGhitza
           Type:  defect   |       Status:  positive_review
       Priority:  major    |    Milestone:  sage-duplicate/invalid/wontfix
      Component:  algebra  |   Resolution:
       Keywords:           |    Merged in:
        Authors:           |    Reviewers:
Report Upstream:  N/A      |  Work issues:
         Branch:           |       Commit:
   Dependencies:           |     Stopgaps:
---------------------------+----------------------------------------------
Changes (by bruno):

 * status:  needs_review => positive_review
 * milestone:  sage-6.4 => sage-duplicate/invalid/wontfix


Comment:

 It was not noticed that #17190 is a duplicate of this ticket. I fixed the
 problem in #17190:

 {{{#!python
 sage: R.<x,y> = RR[]
 sage: U = R.univariate_ring(x)
 sage: U([y])
 y
 }}}

--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/12871#comment:7>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to