#12871: Conversion for RR[x][y] stricter than for QQ[x][y]
---------------------------+----------------------------------------------
Reporter: vbraun | Owner: AlexGhitza
Type: defect | Status: positive_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-duplicate/invalid/wontfix
Component: algebra | Resolution:
Keywords: | Merged in:
Authors: | Reviewers:
Report Upstream: N/A | Work issues:
Branch: | Commit:
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
---------------------------+----------------------------------------------
Changes (by bruno):
* status: needs_review => positive_review
* milestone: sage-6.4 => sage-duplicate/invalid/wontfix
Comment:
It was not noticed that #17190 is a duplicate of this ticket. I fixed the
problem in #17190:
{{{#!python
sage: R.<x,y> = RR[]
sage: U = R.univariate_ring(x)
sage: U([y])
y
}}}
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/12871#comment:7>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.