#19319: iterator over pairs on diagonals a la Cantor pairing
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: dkrenn | Owner:
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-6.9
Component: misc | Resolution:
Keywords: | Merged in:
Authors: Daniel Krenn | Reviewers:
Report Upstream: N/A | Work issues:
Branch: | Commit:
u/dkrenn/product_cantor_pairing | 70185c3a13f573cf1eacbec2eb2122082e6c375f
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by ncohen):
> I think having SEEALSO blocks with links pointing directly to related
functions/classes is a very useful thing (There have been some discussions
on sage-devel about this.); it makes it easy for the user to find
functions without a long search (Finding the "correct" function is
definitly a problem for Sage users have...)
You got me wrong: I did not ask you to remove the seealso block. I
proposed to have a
{{{
SEEALSO::
For related functions, refer to the module's documentation
}}}
with a link of course.
Linking n functions to each other requires n*(n-1) different links. If a
function is moved, if a function is added, that requires much more work.
Additionally, it possible that somebody *adding* a function may forget to
update the others, which will not happen if we have an index of function
at the head of the module.
Nathann
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/19319#comment:22>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
