#18941: Poset documentation polishing: chains and antichains
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: jmantysalo | Owner:
Type: enhancement | Status: positive_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-6.9
Component: documentation | Resolution:
Keywords: | Merged in:
Authors: Jori Mäntysalo | Reviewers: Kevin Dilks
Report Upstream: N/A | Work issues:
Branch: | Commit:
u/jmantysalo/poset_polishing_chains| 93f35e5dd1f134f072a84f8d08971207d64d8023
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by jmantysalo):
Replying to [comment:36 kdilks]:
> All the changes you made look good to me, positive review.
Thanks!
> Two comments related to things I saw while looking through the code
(which should probably go in separate tickets):
>
> 1) Somebody should finally implement the wrapper that gives you all
antichains of a specified size.
True. Same applies to chains of specified size.
> 2) In {{{is_chain_of_poset}}}, I think there should be an additional
optional parameter {{{strict}}}, so that when {{{ordered=True}}}, you can
test whether a given list of elements is a weakly increasing chain or a
strictly increasing chain. Right now it only tests for strict chains.
?? Isn't it just another way? Name of the parameter should propably be
`saturated`.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/18941#comment:37>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
