#19288: Make real/complex number field embeddings more accurate
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: pbruin | Owner:
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_review
Priority: minor | Milestone: sage-6.9
Component: number fields | Resolution:
Keywords: | Merged in:
Authors: Jeroen Demeyer | Reviewers:
Report Upstream: N/A | Work issues:
Branch: | Commit:
u/jdemeyer/make_real_complex_number_field_embeddings_more_accurate|
a987fd28c715d09ac3373710120bb8cec5bf4034
Dependencies: #19330 | Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by cremona):
Thanks for all the great work on this which I have not been able to follow
as I was at a workshop last week.
I think there will be other places where this functionality will be useful
-- for examples, computation of periods and elliptic logs, where the
result depends on an embedding and what is stored is an embedding into AA
or QQbar, only converted to a RealField or ComplexField with some
precision when needed.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/19288#comment:17>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
