#19365: Bug in lattice_polytope.positive_integer_relations
-------------------------+-------------------------------------------------
Reporter: | Owner:
tmonteil | Status: needs_work
Type: | Milestone: sage-6.10
defect | Resolution:
Priority: major | Merged in:
Component: | Reviewers: Andrey Novoseltsev, Thierry
geometry | Monteil
Keywords: | Work issues:
Authors: | Commit:
Vincent Delecroix | 651684a41026bee07a49be83b238b059e72693bc
Report Upstream: N/A | Stopgaps:
Branch: |
public/19365 |
Dependencies: |
-------------------------+-------------------------------------------------
Comment (by novoselt):
Good point. The old code would break right away on anything but the matrix
and it looked at first as a good idea to have matrix constructor built in,
but apparently it is not. I agree that both input and output formats of
this function are not the best possible ones, but that's what it has been
for ages (like since 2006/7), so let's keep it. Those who want to use this
function have to do the conversion or write a new one and deprecate this
one.
Interestingly, it is not used anywhere in Sage (I thought that somewhere
in toric code it may be handy) but I am pretty sure I used it at some
point in my worksheets.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/19365#comment:11>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
