#19016: Better hash for Element
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: ncohen | Owner:
Type: defect | Status: needs_review
Priority: critical | Milestone: sage-6.10
Component: misc | Resolution:
Keywords: | Merged in:
Authors: Nils Bruin, | Reviewers:
Vincent Delecroix | Work issues:
Report Upstream: N/A | Commit:
Branch: public/19016-bis | d34e7c3dfcda5b31ea4b5f1d112d843ae0d0e549
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by nbruin):
OK, this should provide sufficient doctests to not let the formal coverage
count decrease anywhere.
There's a new failure that wasn't fixed yet, due to colored permutations
being merged which newly depend on the old hash. It illustrates that if we
don't merge this ticket soon, we'll just keep playing catch-up, because
people won't learn they have to provide their own hash.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/19016#comment:95>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
