#19422: A new structure for Punctured Codes
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: dlucas | Owner:
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-6.10
Component: coding theory | Resolution:
Keywords: | Merged in:
Authors: David Lucas | Reviewers:
Report Upstream: N/A | Work issues:
Branch: | Commit:
u/dlucas/punctured_codes | 37683a13c904825582e9a4457a44ba0b70168a33
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by jsrn):
I think the default should always be to retain as much structure as
possible. The `C.punctured()` method is certainly the "default" a user
would call.
Furthermore, having a `PuncturedCode` should never get in the way for
users who are simply interested in the unstructured linear code
representation: it advertises exactly the same methods (plus some more).
So I don't think there is any deprecation needed.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/19422#comment:6>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
