#19399: let category of growth group be determined by input
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: dkrenn | Owner:
Type: defect | Status: needs_work
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-6.10
Component: asymptotic | Resolution:
expansions | Merged in:
Keywords: | Reviewers: Clemens Heuberger
Authors: Daniel Krenn | Work issues:
Report Upstream: N/A | Commit:
Branch: u/dkrenn/t/19399 | 4626cc13efc233cd0545b253815babbf3df5ecec
Dependencies: #19083 | Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Changes (by dkrenn):
* commit: 997380baa67cc3d7fda5e9791c29d58f3ff15515 =>
4626cc13efc233cd0545b253815babbf3df5ecec
Comment:
Replying to [comment:15 cheuberg]:
> I added one reviewer commits and have two more remarks.
Cross-reviewed.
> 1. `sage.rings.asymptotic.misc.transform_category`: document parameter
`initial_category`
Documented.
> 2. `GenericGrowthElement.__classcall__`: does it make sense to promote
polynomials to Posets? How is the partial order defined on polynomials?
The default order is `degrevlex`, see
http://doc.sagemath.org/html/en/reference/polynomial_rings/sage/rings/polynomial/polynomial_ring_constructor.html#sage.rings.polynomial.polynomial_ring_constructor.PolynomialRing
Thus, polynomial rings should be posets as well.
----
New commits:
||[http://git.sagemath.org/sage.git/commit/?id=4626cc13efc233cd0545b253815babbf3df5ecec
4626cc1]||{{{document initial_category}}}||
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/19399#comment:17>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
