#18545: Some examples to plot() for posets.
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: jmantysalo | Owner:
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-6.10
Component: combinatorics | Resolution:
Keywords: | Merged in:
Authors: Jori Mäntysalo | Reviewers:
Report Upstream: N/A | Work issues:
Branch: | Commit:
u/jmantysalo/some_examples_to_plot___for_posets_|
e377fda7aaac090afb2a9e36e6ea86dc271304c0
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Changes (by {'newvalue': u'Jori M\xe4ntysalo', 'oldvalue': ''}):
* cc: chapoton (added)
* status: new => needs_review
* milestone: sage-wishlist => sage-6.10
* component: documentation => combinatorics
* author: => Jori Mäntysalo
Comment:
Frédéric: This is my suggestion to `plot()` of posets. Examples are kind
of artificial, but I am sure that there is no good real-life example using
every one of possible options.
I also added some keywords, so that now you can say for example
`element_shape` instead of `vertex_shape`. There is still some
unorthogonal things, but they should be done on graph side. I would except
to have `vertex_shapes={'s': [1, 2]}` when we have `vertex_color={'red':
[1, 2]}` and so on.
I hope that users can now better see what is available. I think that at
least coloring of some elements can be a good thing. Think for example
showing elements of Frattini sublattice in red.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/18545#comment:3>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
