#15536: Implement symplectic and orthogonal bases of Sym
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: tscrim | Owner: sage-combinat
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_work
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-6.10
Component: combinatorics | Resolution:
Keywords: days54, sym | Merged in:
Authors: Travis Scrimshaw | Reviewers:
Report Upstream: N/A | Work issues:
Branch: | Commit:
public/combinat/sf/sp_orth | 8e690e2a13b8c266f0d6a46c7c9b01a01aa48933
Dependencies: #17096 | Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Changes (by zabrocki):
* status: needs_review => needs_work
Comment:
I don't think that this is a bad way of resolving this, but it may be
pushing the problem elsewhere. I am seeing:
{{{
File "combinat/ncsf_qsym/qsym.py", line 1873, in
sage.combinat.ncsf_qsym.qsym.QuasiSymmetricFunctions.Monomial.lambda_of_monomial
Failed example:
M = QuasiSymmetricFunctions(Integers(5)).Monomial()
}}}
Are ncsf/qsym going to require the same hack? Will every combinatorial
Hopf algebra require it?
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/15536#comment:49>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
