#17220: Matrix_complex_ball_dense: Level 1 implementation (using acb_mat from
Arb)
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: cheuberg | Owner:
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_info
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-6.10
Component: numerical | Resolution:
Keywords: arb, acb_mat, | Merged in:
complex balls, matrix | Reviewers:
Authors: Clemens Heuberger | Work issues:
Report Upstream: N/A | Commit:
Branch: | 6c9f0c7cefae2ad60c2a152c233e515ee9bce176
u/cheuberg/matrix/acb_dense | Stopgaps:
Dependencies: #18546, #19063 |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by mmezzarobba):
Replying to [comment:15 cheuberg]:
> 1. remove the `experimental` warning in `ComplexBallField` now.
> 2. remove the `experimental` warning in `ComplexBallField` once #19152
is merged
> 3. move `CBF = ComplexBallField()` to a separate module, e.g.
`sage.rings.complex_ball_acb_default` and replace all lines `from
sage.rings.complex_ball_acb import CBF` by `from
sage.rings.complex_ball_acb_default import CBF` and undo this change once
the `experimental` warning disappears
> 4. fix doctests in 252 other modules whenever a matrix is constructed
which falls back to the generic implementation.
My preference goes to option 2.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/17220#comment:16>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
