#19520: implement random triangulations in a bijective way
-------------------------+-------------------------------------------------
       Reporter:         |        Owner:
  chapoton               |       Status:  needs_review
           Type:         |    Milestone:  sage-6.10
  enhancement            |   Resolution:
       Priority:  major  |    Merged in:
      Component:  graph  |    Reviewers:
  theory                 |  Work issues:
       Keywords:         |       Commit:
  random graph           |  226cef6191ba7ef0f264e8e687e594b3f4f10976
        Authors:         |     Stopgaps:
  Frédéric Chapoton      |
Report Upstream:  N/A    |
         Branch:         |
  u/chapoton/19520       |
   Dependencies:         |
-------------------------+-------------------------------------------------

Comment (by chapoton):

 Well, this is a different "random triangulation", not the same
 distribution at all. Mine is better because it's almost uniform, but
 nevertheless one could keep the other.

 Should I use `.append` and `.extend` everywhere possible ?

--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/19520#comment:3>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to