#19524: fixing a few bad trac roles, and adding some
-------------------------+-------------------------------------------------
Reporter: | Owner:
chapoton | Status: needs_review
Type: | Milestone: sage-6.10
enhancement | Resolution:
Priority: major | Merged in:
Component: | Reviewers: Jori Mäntysalo
documentation | Work issues:
Keywords: trac | Commit:
role | f5c84d1188d3a3e6b06d0e9a372a65eb1eb31342
Authors: | Stopgaps:
Frédéric Chapoton |
Report Upstream: N/A |
Branch: |
public/19524 |
Dependencies: |
-------------------------+-------------------------------------------------
Changes (by jmantysalo):
* reviewer: => Jori Mäntysalo
Comment:
Seems good.
However, is there reason to use formal trac reference in comments? See for
example `modular/dims.py`. You have also removed some dot - intentionally?
"See trac 1234" or "See trac 1234." - I don't know which one it should be.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/19524#comment:2>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
