#19524: fixing a few bad trac roles, and adding some
-------------------------+-------------------------------------------------
Reporter: | Owner:
chapoton | Status: positive_review
Type: | Milestone: sage-6.10
enhancement | Resolution:
Priority: major | Merged in:
Component: | Reviewers: Jori Mäntysalo, Jeroen Demeyer
documentation | Work issues:
Keywords: trac | Commit:
role | f97e522fd09a046ad733045194512f4b82c820f0
Authors: | Stopgaps:
Frédéric Chapoton |
Report Upstream: N/A |
Branch: |
public/19524 |
Dependencies: |
-------------------------+-------------------------------------------------
Changes (by jmantysalo):
* status: needs_review => positive_review
Comment:
Replying to [comment:12 jdemeyer]:
> Did somebody check that the documentation actually builds? Apart from
this: positive review.
I built html docs. And to be sure, I am now (again) running short doctests
just to be sure.
I did not check every one of built html page, just some random sample.
Those were good. I mark this as positive review.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/19524#comment:13>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
