#19513: remove expired deprecations in sage/combinat
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: zabrocki | Owner:
Type: enhancement | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-6.10
Component: combinatorics | Resolution:
Keywords: deprecate | Merged in:
Authors: Mike Zabrocki | Reviewers:
Report Upstream: N/A | Work issues:
Branch: | Commit:
public/ticket/19513 | 2b6c11ae6423f0e8ea41fe4f537c2765e38dcf14
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by darij):
1) Why are we deprecating `RestrictedPartitions`? From the way it looks,
this functionality is not implemented elsewhere in its full strength
(i.e., fixing both a set and a length).
2) Why are we undeprecating `TransitiveIdeal`? Not deleting it is fine,
but removing the deprecation warnings?
3) I have just realized that `CyclicPermutations` of a multiset misbehave:
e.g., the cardinality method is inherited from `Permutations` and thus
disagrees with the list method. What should we do about this?
4) Another lost child:
{{{
sage: Permutations(["c","a","t"])[0]
['c', 'a', 't']
sage: _ in Permutations()
False
}}}
(Yet, the class of `Permutations(["c","a","t"])[0]` inherits from
`Permutations`.)
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/19513#comment:23>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
