#18225: Missing polytopes in the library
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: vdelecroix | Owner:
Type: enhancement | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-6.9
Component: geometry | Resolution:
Keywords: beginner, | Merged in:
polytope | Reviewers:
Authors: | Work issues:
Report Upstream: N/A | Commit:
Branch: | 8778b54a75a8171383b56c4e8d3e0ec84ed20007
public/ticket/18225 | Stopgaps:
Dependencies: #18213 |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by vdelecroix):
Replying to [comment:17 chapoton]:
> Hello,
>
> no problem. You can just add this to the existing branch. I am no longer
active on this ticket. Maybe it would be a good time to get it into sage,
as a good first step, even if it does not implement everything suggested.
You are free to split it into several tickets.
Quick remark on the code: some of the constructors do not accept
`exact`/`base_ring` as arguments. I know that some of them are infinitely
slow with `exact=True`. There are already some of them that have default
`exact=False` that is fine with me if there is a clear warning.
PS: I have code that improves the generic double description algorithm and
makes the constructions reasonable over QQbar... but it needs a bit of
cleaning.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/18225#comment:18>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
