#19612: revert 14243
-------------------------------+-------------------------
Reporter: was | Owner:
Type: enhancement | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-6.10
Component: misc | Resolution:
Keywords: | Merged in:
Authors: | Reviewers:
Report Upstream: N/A | Work issues:
Branch: | Commit:
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
-------------------------------+-------------------------
Comment (by jhpalmieri):
I don't object to reverting #14243. One disadvantage to putting Sage's
packages in a non-standard location is that users might need to install
them twice: once for the system Python and once for Sage. This would not
be what people expect. I don't know that much about the Python packaging
system; can we have Sage's Python look in several different places for
packages (`$DOT_SAGE/site-package` and also unless some Sage-specific
environment variable is set, `~/.local/lib/python/site-packages` and/or
`~/Library/Python/2.7/lib/python/site-packages`)?
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/19612#comment:5>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
