#19040: rewrite Expression.__nonzero__()
-------------------------------+--------------------------
       Reporter:  rws          |        Owner:
           Type:  enhancement  |       Status:  needs_info
       Priority:  major        |    Milestone:  sage-6.9
      Component:  symbolics    |   Resolution:
       Keywords:               |    Merged in:
        Authors:               |    Reviewers:
Report Upstream:  N/A          |  Work issues:
         Branch:               |       Commit:
   Dependencies:               |     Stopgaps:
-------------------------------+--------------------------

Comment (by vdelecroix):

 What would be the difference between the output `NotImplemented` and
 `Undecidable`!?

 As I already mentioned in [comment:24 comment 24], it makes few sense that
 `satisfiable(expr)` returns `Undecidable`. Each formula is either `True`
 or `False`. I am here only assuming that mathematics are consistent. Of
 course `satisfiable` can not work for all input and when it can not it
 should return `NotImplemented`. That being said, some formula `expr` have
 no proof of their truthness (from Godel), but then I doubt any computer
 would actually be able to prove it.

 In an ideal world, the function `satisfiable(expr)` would return one of:
  - `(True, example)`
  - `(False, proof)`
  - `NotImplemented`

--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/19040#comment:41>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to