#19640: Do not drop LDFLAGS
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: vbraun | Owner:
Type: defect | Status: needs_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-6.10
Component: packages: | Resolution:
standard | Merged in:
Keywords: | Reviewers:
Authors: Volker Braun | Work issues:
Report Upstream: N/A | Commit:
Branch: | 4c53d2995cd4304cf6413f01f7938a31f97d6e11
u/vbraun/do_not_drop_ldflags | Stopgaps:
Dependencies: |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by fbissey):
Looks ok but begs the question for a separate ticket: Do we still need
those `SAGE64` sections? If so why? Otherwise it looks good to me. But
this is the only place for `singular` with `LDFLAGS`
{{{
if [ "x$SAGE64" = xyes ]; then
echo "Building a 64-bit version of Singular"
CFLAGS="$CFLAGS -m64 "
CXXFLAGS="$CXXFLAGS -m64"
CPPFLAGS="$CPPFLAGS -m64"
LDFLAGS="$LDFLAGS -m64 "; export LDFLAGS
if [ "x`uname`" = xSunOS ] ; then
export CC="$CC -m64"
export CXX="$CXX -m64"
fi
fi
}}}
so it is not any harder that the others and it should already be OK. If it
isn't, I'll be interested in a build log.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/19640#comment:4>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
