#18061: Implement (correct) action of Atkin-Lehner operators on newforms
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: pbruin | Owner:
Type: defect | Status: needs_work
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-6.8
Component: modular forms | Resolution:
Keywords: newform Atkin- | Merged in:
Lehner operator | Reviewers:
Authors: Peter Bruin, | Work issues:
David Loeffler | Commit:
Report Upstream: N/A | cd6b13f1e11ee10ff9d22d5972bc27ac64422c00
Branch: | Stopgaps:
u/pbruin/18061-rebased |
Dependencies: #18068, #18072, |
#18086, #18478 |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Changes (by davidloeffler):
* status: needs_review => needs_work
Comment:
Hi Peter,
Mega-pedantic comment: in the docstring for "def atkin_lehner_eigenvalue",
the "NOTE" is untrue (as the accompanying example shows). It would be nice
if we could get this merged, but our contributions are now so much
intertwined that we can't really review each other's code -- we need a
third-party reviewer.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/18061#comment:37>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
