#19555: Implement a containment for cartesian_product
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: tscrim | Owner: sage-combinat
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-6.10
Component: combinatorics | Resolution:
Keywords: | Merged in:
Authors: Travis Scrimshaw | Reviewers:
Report Upstream: N/A | Work issues:
Branch: | Commit:
public/sets/contains_cartesian_product-19555|
7466511b9ba67f2d6b8985fa0f4c641fb9e58978
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by vdelecroix):
Replying to [comment:8 tscrim]:
> Replying to [comment:6 vdelecroix]:
> > 1. What is the rationale for having tuple being considered as elements
of the cartesian product?
>
> They are just wrappers around tuples, and at times, it is beneficial to
not wrap/unwrap such objects, such as if the Cartesian product is the set
of keys of a dict/Family.
Then in that case I would actually implement an option in
`CartesianProduct` to actually '''use''' tuples directly.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/19555#comment:9>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
