#13580: Parallel map reduce on SearchForest
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: hivert | Owner: hivert
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-6.4
Component: combinatorics | Resolution:
Keywords: map-reduce, | Merged in:
days57 | Reviewers:
Authors: Florent Hivert, | Work issues:
Nathann Cohen | Commit:
Report Upstream: N/A | 31c4735651aa4f56c7e6899e6352669fa2b21d99
Branch: | Stopgaps:
u/hivert/13580/map_reduce |
Dependencies: |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by slabbe):
Replying to [comment:37 hivert]:
> What do you think ?
I think that some doctest are more important than other, especially the
first doctests that people might be expected to see when using the map
reduce code. For example the `map_reduce` method in the recursively
enumerated set file is one possible entry point where clarity of doctests
matters more. Therefore, I like the way you change the doctest.
Definitively, the top of the module is an important entry point. For other
sub methods of the class map reduce, I care less...
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/13580#comment:42>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
