#6580: ratpoints -- this must be fixed to build with gcc-3.4.x
----------------------+-----------------------------------------------------
 Reporter:  was       |       Owner:  rlm       
     Type:  defect    |      Status:  new       
 Priority:  major     |   Milestone:  sage-4.1.2
Component:  packages  |    Keywords:            
 Reviewer:            |      Author:            
   Merged:            |  
----------------------+-----------------------------------------------------

Comment(by mvngu):

 At #7021, drkirkby updates prereq to 0.4 and writes "If gcc is used as the
 C compiler, the configure script checks it is at least gcc 4.0.1." Does
 this updated spkg invalidate this ticket? Here's a conversation on IRC:
 {{{
 23:14 < mvngu> williamstein: At #7021, I see drkirkby's note "If gcc is
 used as
                the C compiler, the configure script checks it is at least
 gcc
                4.0.1". This makes me wonder about the GCC 3.4.x
 requirement at
                #6580.
 23:14 < williamstein> good point.
 23:15 < williamstein> maybe we should just move ahead and forget about
                       supporting gcc-3.4.
 23:15 < williamstein> I would be ok with that.
 23:15 < williamstein> in which case 6580 could be invalidated.
 23:15 < mvngu> williamstein: I don't know of any machine using GCC 3.4.x.
 23:15 < williamstein> yep
 23:15 < williamstein> that's why we didn't notice until after the release.
 }}}

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/6580#comment:3>
Sage <http://sagemath.org/>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to