#19594: Implement the cactus group
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: tscrim | Owner: tscrim
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-7.0
Component: group theory | Resolution:
Keywords: cactus | Merged in:
Authors: Travis Scrimshaw | Reviewers:
Report Upstream: N/A | Work issues:
Branch: | Commit:
public/groups/cactus_group-19594 | 7eb2a1278ea0ca08375f87e0f82081218a2ea1ec
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by dimpase):
Replying to [comment:14 tscrim]:
> Replying to [comment:12 dimpase]:
> > I wonder why the code does not compute a presentation for the pure
cactus group. This is more or less standard thing, Reidemeister-Schreier
algorithm, implemented in GAP (see e.g. `PresentationSubgroup`).
>
> Is this a comment on my code or GAP's? I don't know the Reidemeister-
Schreier algorithm, but I am not opposed to trying to extend the
implementation.
it's a comment saying that this is doable (not sure how interesting).
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/19594#comment:18>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
