#16116: Multiplication of dense cyclotomic matrices should be faster
-------------------------------------------------+-------------------------
       Reporter:  jipilab                        |        Owner:
           Type:  enhancement                    |       Status:  new
       Priority:  major                          |    Milestone:  sage-7.0
      Component:  number fields                  |   Resolution:
       Keywords:  cyclotomic field, matrix,      |    Merged in:
  multiplication, benchmark, days57              |    Reviewers:
        Authors:                                 |  Work issues:
Report Upstream:  N/A                            |       Commit:
         Branch:                                 |     Stopgaps:
   Dependencies:                                 |
-------------------------------------------------+-------------------------
Changes (by tscrim):

 * milestone:  sage-6.9 => sage-7.0


Comment:

 It seems that matrix multiplication over the universal cyclotomic field is
 on the same order as the polynomial ring (probably because it uses the
 generic matrix class):
 {{{
 sage: %timeit m * m
 1000 loops, best of 3: 224 µs per loop
 sage: %timeit elmt * elmt
 1000 loops, best of 3: 207 µs per loop
 }}}
 However for UCF matrices, I'm thinking we might benefit from either using
 (lib)GAP's matrix multiplication or internally storing the GAP element and
 only converting it to a Sage UCF element as necessary. See #19821 for a
 use-case.

--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/16116#comment:17>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to