#19854: Index of functions to finite lattices
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: jmantysalo | Owner:
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_work
Priority: minor | Milestone: sage-7.0
Component: documentation | Resolution:
Keywords: | Merged in:
Authors: Jori Mäntysalo | Reviewers:
Report Upstream: N/A | Work issues:
Branch: | Commit:
u/jmantysalo/lattices_doc_index | 5fcce2f9afd25bbcc5721750214b6ffa75136e3e
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by ncohen):
Yo !
> `lattices.py` contains three classes, i.e. (whole) lattice and
semilattices. Now, hand-made version contained a table like
Oh. I see ... Yep, no way to have the methods of different classes in the
same table I believe ...
> Second is not so technical. It is possible to have for example
There I really don't see the problem in having the same message twice.
Setting both to {{{Return ``True`` if the lattice is atomic and upper
semimodular.}}} can't hurt anybody.
> But I am a fan of Nathann's code. I think I could use it at matrices and
groups, at least. They are used is basic courses at university, so they
should have good documentation page.
Yep. Matrices and groups could surely use an index. Crazy that it hasn't
happened before btw `O_o`
Nathann
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/19854#comment:6>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
