#19929: GF(16) (without explicit variable name)
-------------------------+-------------------------------------------------
Reporter: | Owner:
ncohen | Status: needs_review
Type: | Milestone: sage-7.1
enhancement | Resolution:
Priority: major | Merged in:
Component: | Reviewers:
number fields | Work issues:
Keywords: | Commit:
Authors: | f96f09f848e3b9877aa50c4d4c26557e2181a9fd
Nathann Cohen | Stopgaps:
Report Upstream: N/A |
Branch: |
public/19929 |
Dependencies: |
-------------------------+-------------------------------------------------
Comment (by ncohen):
> I would argue for #17569 over having 'a' be the default variable name.
Nathann, do you object to the solution proposed there?
If you see how to implement what is described at #17569 by something like
next week and have it in needs_review by then, I don't have *any*
objection. I just want it to work.
If you want me to close a ticket that implements a ready solution to a
problem in exchange for a 13 months old ticket that still does not contain
any code, then of course I object.
To me, a ticket without code just does not exist. It is a thought in
somebody's head, and this somebody often has forgotten it. I don't close
tickets because of that.
Nathann
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/19929#comment:4>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
