#19942: "abelian" vs. "Abelian"
------------------------------+------------------------
Reporter: jmantysalo | Owner:
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: minor | Milestone: sage-7.1
Component: misc | Resolution:
Keywords: | Merged in:
Authors: | Reviewers:
Report Upstream: N/A | Work issues:
Branch: | Commit:
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
------------------------------+------------------------
Comment (by jhpalmieri):
Replying to [comment:2 jmantysalo]:
> Replying to [comment:1 jhpalmieri]:
> > There is no compelling reason to change "abelian" to "Abelian". I
think this should be closed.
>
> Not a big thing, but this would be consistent with for example #19788.
At least Wikipedia uses always caps for Abelian, Hamiltonian etc.
See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abelian_group#A_note_on_the_typography.
That is, I don't think there is consistency in the mathematical world for
the capitalization, or not, of "abelian".
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/19942#comment:3>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
