#19690: Add "Standard example" poset
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: jmantysalo | Owner:
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-7.0
Component: combinatorics | Resolution:
Keywords: poset | Merged in:
Authors: Kevin Dilks, Jori | Reviewers:
Mäntysalo | Work issues:
Report Upstream: N/A | Commit:
Branch: | acd7169ee225d47b9b6d6a6ee017bd652ed25ea7
u/jmantysalo/add__standard_example__poset| Stopgaps:
Dependencies: |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by jhpalmieri):
I don't know why you are resistant to adding a reference; what harm can it
possibly cause? Can't adding a reference only improve the situation?
Anyway, you asked my opinion. At least one other person expressed the same
opinion. Use wikipedia or use some other reference; I'm not a poset
expert, so I don't know what reference would be most definitive.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/19690#comment:11>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
