#19981: is_exact for asymptotic ring
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: behackl | Owner:
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-7.1
Component: asymptotic | Resolution:
expansions | Merged in:
Keywords: | Reviewers: Daniel Krenn, Clemens
Authors: | Heuberger
Report Upstream: N/A | Work issues:
Branch: | Commit:
u/behackl/asy/is_exact | 26639e22157016fa1410ac8e14affd391779b6b9
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by dkrenn):
Replying to [comment:9 cheuberg]:
> Apart from that: while the routine is hardly efficiency critical, it is
somewhat inefficient to construct `exact_part` and then comparing with the
original just to check whether all summands are `ExactTerm`s. If this is
to ensure that future extensions of the term monoids won't introduce
inconsistencies, then there could be a helper method `is_exact`.
True. Maybe something like `all(T.is_exact() for T in self.summands)`...
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/19981#comment:10>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
