#19944: asymptotic expansions: singularity analysis
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: behackl | Owner:
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-7.1
Component: asymptotic | Resolution:
expansions | Merged in:
Keywords: | Reviewers: Daniel Krenn
Authors: Benjamin Hackl, | Work issues:
Clemens Heuberger | Commit:
Report Upstream: N/A | c79a6f7bbb3f17454a1c6238193696e525a8c0ec
Branch: u/cheuberg/asy | Stopgaps:
/singularity-analysis-method |
Dependencies: #19532, #19969, |
#19981 |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by dkrenn):
Replying to [comment:21 cheuberg]:
> Replying to [comment:18 dkrenn]:
> > 1. Is `(1-z\zeta) \to 0` correct or should it be `(1-z/\zeta) \to 0`?
Maybe using `z\to\zeta` instead of `(1-z/\zeta) \to 0`? (I don't have a
strong preference for changing, but from an outside view, this would be
easier to understand.
>
> I prefer `(1-z/\zeta) \to 0` or perhaps `T = 1/(1-z/\zeta) \to \infty`.
>
> > 2. Should it be mentioned that (in terms and growth groups) a variable
(`_var_` of the parent) represents/equals `1 / (1-z/\zeta)` ?
>
> This should change once asymptotics `z->z_0` are implemented.
>
> What about "`T = 1/(1-z/\zeta) \to \infty` where this element is a
growth element (resp. monomial) in `T`"?
I'm happy with this formulation.
All the other changes are positivly reviewed form my side.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/19944#comment:30>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
