#20015: Sanitize matrix constructor
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: jdemeyer | Owner:
Type: defect | Status: needs_work
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-7.1
Component: linear algebra | Resolution:
Keywords: | Merged in:
Authors: Jeroen Demeyer | Reviewers:
Report Upstream: N/A | Work issues:
Branch: | Commit:
u/jdemeyer/ticket/20015 | c7d3b68141d93f99997b679af0776fc579985279
Dependencies: #20016 | Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by jdemeyer):
Replying to [comment:11 nbruin]:
> This came up on [https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sage-
support/x82MR4yBAek/R3ZBNOsCAQAJ sage-support]
Not really, that was a different issue with `range` vs. `srange`,
unrelated to the matrix constructor. But of course you are right that we
should use Sage integers.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/20015#comment:13>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
