#20125: better code for first_descent in coxeter groups
-------------------------+-------------------------------------------------
Reporter: | Owner:
chapoton | Status: positive_review
Type: | Milestone: sage-duplicate/invalid/wontfix
enhancement | Resolution:
Priority: major | Merged in:
Component: | Reviewers:
combinatorics | Work issues:
Keywords: | Commit:
coxeter | 0c6eaafb86b446dac84e118a644ecf0c974036f8
Authors: | Stopgaps:
Frédéric Chapoton |
Report Upstream: N/A |
Branch: |
public/20125 |
Dependencies: |
-------------------------+-------------------------------------------------
Changes (by chapoton):
* status: needs_work => positive_review
* milestone: sage-7.1 => sage-duplicate/invalid/wontfix
Comment:
ok, then let us close this as invalid.
Maybe the overloading of `is_one` is still a good idea that could be done
in #19870 ?
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/20125#comment:5>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
