#20069: RBF: continued_fraction
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: dkrenn | Owner:
Type: defect | Status: needs_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-7.1
Component: numerical | Resolution:
Keywords: arb | Merged in:
Authors: Daniel Krenn | Reviewers:
Report Upstream: N/A | Work issues:
Branch: u/dkrenn/rbf- | Commit:
continued-frac | 5c3b41fb2499a8eebf543290a902f0ca9dc3a065
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by dkrenn):
Replying to [comment:4 tscrim]:
> All `is_RealIntervalField` does is
> {{{#!python
> return isinstance(x, RealIntervalField_class)
> }}}
> So I think a better check would be
> {{{#!python
> if isinstance(x.parent(), (RealIntervalField_class, RealBallField)):
> }}}
Changed.
> Also, could you make the statement {{{:trac:`20069`::}}} a little more
verbose? Something like
> {{{
> Check that this works for arb elements (:trac:`20069`)::
> }}}
Changed as well. Thank you for your comments.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/20069#comment:6>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
