#7148: [with patch, needs review] tutorial: try to clarify the 'rings' section
-----------------------------+----------------------------------------------
Reporter: jhpalmieri | Owner: jhpalmieri
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_review
Priority: minor | Milestone: sage-4.1.3
Component: documentation | Keywords:
Work_issues: | Author: John Palmieri
Reviewer: | Merged:
-----------------------------+----------------------------------------------
Changes (by jhpalmieri):
* status: new => needs_review
Old description:
> The section in the tutorial on rings can be confusing to people who
> aren't familiar with them, and since this precedes the material on
> matrices (for example), people wanting to know how to solve linear
> equations might be thrown off. This patch attempts to remedy this, at
> least partially.
New description:
The section in the tutorial on rings can be confusing to people who aren't
familiar with them, and since this precedes the material on matrices (for
example), people wanting to know how to solve linear equations might be
thrown off. This patch attempts to remedy this, at least partially.
This patch depends on the scripts patches at #6572 -- without them, many
of the doctests here will not actually be run.
--
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/7148#comment:1>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---