#6642: [with patch, needs review] problem with solve (from the tutorial)
--------------------------+-------------------------------------------------
Reporter: jhpalmieri | Owner:
Type: defect | Status: needs_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-4.1.3
Component: symbolics | Keywords:
Work_issues: | Author:
Reviewer: | Merged:
--------------------------+-------------------------------------------------
Changes (by kcrisman):
* status: needs_work => needs_review
Comment:
Sorry, I was away from the computer when you posted that last comment, and
made a new patch already. I assume that this patch will do the same thing
you were about to do. However, it does fix a doctest issue in
calculus/calculus.py (a numerical integral), so perhaps it will save you a
little trouble if I post this. The issue may also be platform-dependent,
so maybe it helped discover something good - you can use ... to comment
the last digit out if that's what it turns out to be.
Incidentally, my initial thought was that the 1416ff. lines were an
overzealous doctester earlier, after to_poly_solve was first incorporated.
But someone else can change that if that's not the desired behavior.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/6642#comment:11>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
