#18888: failing optional mathematica tests, due to bugs in N() and n()
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: slabbe | Owner:
Type: defect | Status: needs_work
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-7.1
Component: interfaces: | Resolution:
optional | Merged in:
Keywords: mathematica | Reviewers:
Authors: | Work issues: fix `N()` and `n()`
Report Upstream: N/A | Commit:
Branch: public/18888 | 4fd09adee1cffa4fb7922862d20d2587f7837362
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by dimpase):
OK, we don't need to implement `n()` here, only `N()`. As far as `n()`
goes, part of trouble comes from Sage being unable to do `n()` of
constants in the `SR` (symbolic ring) properly. E.g.
{{{
sage: pi.n(10)
3.1
}}}
We can also implement `n()` as `sage().n()`, not sure if we should. E.g.
`gap(2/3).n()` is not implemented. Perhaps explicitly making it throw
`NotImplementedError` is the best?
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/18888#comment:24>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
