#7157: [with patch, needs work] neighbors_out/in instead of
predecessor/successor
in DiGraph
----------------------------+-----------------------------------------------
Reporter: ncohen | Owner: rlm
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_work
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-4.1.3
Component: graph theory | Keywords:
Work_issues: | Author:
Reviewer: | Merged:
----------------------------+-----------------------------------------------
Comment(by rlm):
Replying to [comment:3 ncohen]:
> Should I just add aliases and let the old functions exist ? Should we
keep two copies of the same functions ?
I think aliases would be okay, but people have mentioned before that
aliases are bad. Please bring this up on the sage-devel thread, and do
what the consensus is there.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/7157#comment:4>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
