#20285: make OSX binary distros useful for development
----------------------------+----------------------------------------------
Reporter: dimpase | Owner:
Type: defect | Status: needs_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-duplicate/invalid/wontfix
Component: | Resolution:
distribution | Merged in:
Keywords: | Reviewers:
Authors: Volker | Work issues:
Braun | Commit:
Report Upstream: N/A | Stopgaps:
Branch: |
Dependencies: |
----------------------------+----------------------------------------------
Comment (by dimpase):
Replying to [comment:9 vbraun]:
> I uploaded updated OSX tarballs (for beta0)
>
> IMHO tooling should not be integrated, it sounds good but really you are
going to bite your own tail all the time.
I did not say "integrating into Sage". I meant "make it less weird to use,
and easier to install properly". (Same applies to git trac, by the way).
They are parts of a wider "Sage dev/release tools" project, and I only
have arguments for it to be less loose than it is now, so that just one or
two git commands in the Sage repo is all you need to get them
installed/updated; less strictly necessary reading to do to configure them
properly
(e.g. currently we have an unwritten requirement that binary-pkg must not
be installed via git to be useful, cf https://github.com/sagemath/binary-
pkg/issues/6)
They would remain quite independent from Sage, with their own requirements
etc.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/20285#comment:10>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
