#20323: Common TestSuite for MIP backends
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: mkoeppe | Owner:
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-7.2
Component: numerical | Resolution:
Keywords: lp | Merged in:
Authors: | Reviewers:
Report Upstream: N/A | Work issues:
Branch: | Commit:
u/mkoeppe/common_testsuite_for_mip_backends|
c4e7a839e348f0469b84bde2edcb2dfd69bc71b9
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by mkoeppe):
Replying to [comment:23 vdelecroix]:
> - It would actually be interesting for the tests to have access to the
objects. They are non trivially initialized (maximization vs minimization,
constraints, etc). Using them as a base (with copy) each test suite would
actually run different tests.
I think now I understand better what you meant.
Indeed, at least some instance `_test` methods -- such as the `_test`
methods for `copy` that I just wrote -- would benefit from being invoked
for various examples.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/20323#comment:28>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
