#20323: Common TestSuite for MIP backends
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: mkoeppe | Owner:
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-7.2
Component: numerical | Resolution:
Keywords: lp | Merged in:
Authors: Matthias Koeppe | Reviewers: Thierry Monteil
Report Upstream: N/A | Work issues:
Branch: | Commit:
u/mkoeppe/common_testsuite_for_mip_backends|
22511250dd688bba5d98672fb89b0f779fd28e97
Dependencies: #20326 | Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by dimpase):
please rebase over the latest beta. there is a small merge conflict:
{{{
diff --cc src/sage/numerical/backends/generic_backend.pyx
index aef0cb0,d554470..0000000
--- a/src/sage/numerical/backends/generic_backend.pyx
+++ b/src/sage/numerical/backends/generic_backend.pyx
@@@ -1330,9 -1408,7 +1414,13 @@@ cpdef GenericBackend get_solver(constra
sage: p.base_ring()
Real Double Field
sage: p = get_solver(base_ring=QQ); p
++<<<<<<< HEAD
+ <sage.numerical.backends.ppl_backend.PPLBackend object at ...>
+ sage: p = get_solver(base_ring=ZZ); p
+ <sage.numerical.backends.ppl_backend.PPLBackend object at ...>
++=======
+ <...sage.numerical.backends.ppl_backend.PPLBackend...>
++>>>>>>> 22511250dd688bba5d98672fb89b0f779fd28e97
sage: p.base_ring()
Rational Field
sage: p = get_solver(base_ring=AA); p
}}}
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/20323#comment:40>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
