#19029: doctest Python vs Sage ints
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: vbraun | Owner:
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-
Component: user interface | duplicate/invalid/wontfix
Keywords: | Resolution:
Authors: Volker Braun | Merged in:
Report Upstream: N/A | Reviewers:
Branch: | Work issues:
u/vbraun/doctest_python_vs_sage_ints| Commit:
Dependencies: | 129259d7e537f92b1e55fbb414477231117456fc
| Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Changes (by jmantysalo):
* status: new => needs_review
* milestone: sage-6.9 => sage-duplicate/invalid/wontfix
Comment:
Replying to [comment:24 jdemeyer]:
> I think the only sensible option is to have doctests like
> {{{
> sage: a = my_function()
> sage: a
> 42
> sage: parent(a)
> Integer Ring
> }}}
OK. And because three months have gone, I suggest that we close this
ticket. Click to positive_review if you agree.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/19029#comment:25>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
